Come out on September 7, 14 or 19 and help us remove hazards from Barr Trail before the Pikes Peak Ascent and Marathon! Click the volunteer button to sign up!
Uncategorized
What to expect on a Friends of the Peak work day
The first step is registration.
Pick a date and a project that interests you. Then register for that day on our website, www.friendsofthepeak.org/volunteer . Registration is required for all our workdays. It gives us a way to keep in contact with you. It also gives the project leader an of idea how much we might accomplish on the work day, and how many tools to bring to the trail head. A few days before the workday we will send you the details of the meeting place and information about what to bring to the workday.
Age Requirements
We love workers of all ages however our children 14 and 15 need to be accompanied by a responsible adult a signed parental waiver, children 16-18 can work with a signed parental waiver.
Meeting details, logistics, and practical stuff:
Most of our workdays are on the Seven Bridges Trail (7BT), Saint Mary’s Falls Trail (SMF), and Barr Trail. On 7BT and SMF days we meet at the paved parking lot at the top of Cheyenne Mountain Boulevard where it intersects Gold Camp Road. We unlock the gate and drive through to the trail heads, saving us a 1.25 mile hike to the SMF trailhead or a 0.75 mile hike to the 7BT trailhead. When we work on Barr Trail, the city of Manitou Springs allows us to park for free while we are working. We will provide you with a dated parking pass that you will need to display on your dashboard. Sometimes parking will be in one of the parking lots downtown, and you can take the free shuttle bus to the cog railroad stop, or we might arrange a carpool. Other times we may be able to park right at the trailhead. When we work at other locations there will be different procedures.
Before we start work: introductions, instructions and a safety briefing.
Once everyone has arrived, the project leader will describe the scope of the work and the goals for the day. There will be a safety briefing that includes general outdoor safety, any specific hazards known to exist, and instructions about safe usage, carrying and storing of the tools. Then you’ll hear about what to do if there is an accident, first aid, and evacuation procedures.Then it’s time to grab the tools and hike to the worksite.
What is the work like?
Sometimes it’s strenuous (digging with a pick mattock or steel rock bar, carrying rocks that require multiple people to lift, carrying lumber.) Other tasks are easier (replacing fence posts and rails, cutting back encroaching vegetation, building small rock walls, raking, shoveling, and tamping.) No volunteer is ever expected to do any task that they think will injure them. We take frequent water and rest breaks, and a lunch break.
Finishing up:
We stop work, do a tool inventory, and hike back to the trailhead. We will have cold soft drinks, light snacks, and watermelon. (Watermelon is a tradition!)
Now for some pictures. 1., some of the tools; 2., instructions and safety briefing; 3., some of the places we work. 7BT, SMF, Barr.
August 2023 News Letter – Fenceline Repairs
Well, that tumbling boulder sure gave us a lot of things to fix on Barr trail. Here are some pictures of what we were doing on our first four days of fence repair, May 20 and 25, and June 8 and 11.
May 20: Our first job was to make a good path around the boulder. Here’s me sawing through the mangled trunk of the tree that finally stopped the boulder.
We’ve talked about “the boulder” that tumbled down the hillside and crashed through the fence in multiple places. But there was more than one boulder tumbling down the hill, although we don’t really know how many. It’s clear this smaller (about 4’x2’x3’) boulder (to the left of the trail in the next picture) was a new arrival. We’re glad it stopped where it did. And we decided to leave it right where it is, and build the new fence around it.
On May 25 we were back on Barr trail, doing routine (not boulder damage) post and rail work Here’s Mike installing a new fence rail in a scenic location.
Then we needed to do some quick repairs on the tread on the trail segment above the boulder. Here Susan argues with Brian while I take pictures and Courteney does all the work
On June 8 we were back to repairing fence damaged by the boulder above SB9. Here’s Shanda getting ready to drill the holes in the post so she can attach the rails.
Finally, on June 11 we built a drain structure on the trail before we replaced the segment of fence that now goes over it. Since the big boulder followed the existing drainage channel, we decided it would be a good place to enhance and armor the drain. The drawing on the picture explains what we want it to do. And so far, it’s doing its job very well.
So that’s what we got done by June 11. But wait, there’s more!
We’ve done much more than this. Stay tuned, I’ll get another newsletter out as soon as I can. Better yet, there are still a few more workdays on the schedule this season. Join us and see for yourself!
Sign up at https://friendsofthepeak.org/sign-up/
– Steve Driska
Ring the Peak
Beginnings by Jim Strub, submitted November 2015
The concept of a trail looping around the Pikes Peak massif had been in many minds for a long time. The concept became a civic-supported formal recommendation as a result of the Pikes Peak Multi-Use Plan — a large scale, year-long planning effort jointly sponsored by Colorado Springs Utilities and the USFS Pikes Peak Ranger District. Vic Eklund (CSU) and Frank Landis (USFS) managed it, with Design Workshop doing the administration. The 44MB report is online.
A large number of citizens participated in the study. They were designated the Citizens Advisory Group. The PPMUP recommended a 60-to-70 mile loop trail around Pikes Peak. The conceptual, generalized route of the loop was projected primarily over existing trails and, if necessary, roads, except in the southwest segment where it was a generalized route through the area of the Bison Reservoirs. It included access points —“portals.” Study participants included representatives from virtually every possible stakeholder in the area.
At the conclusion of the study, CSU and USFS formally handed over execution of the plan to the CAG. In early 2000 a small number of CAG members established a working group for getting this started. Included in this group were Josh Osterhoudt of Medicine Wheel, Mary (Ryan) Burger of Friends of the Peak, and Jim Strub, who had served on the North Slope Watershed Committee and Pikes Peak Highway Advisory Commission. Josh offered to lead it and hold the meetings at his place of business (Pepsi Cola Bottling, on North Stone). Josh invited others to join the effort and prepared meeting agendas. After a few meetings it became obvious that the group would need to organize into something like a 501(3)(c). But did this require a new organization? There was already a volunteer organization with a mission focused on Pikes Peak – Friends of the Peak. So Mary agreed to approach the FOTP Board about expanding their charter to include carrying out the PPMUP recommendations. Josh and Jim went to the next FOTP Board meeting. Mary had already greased the skids. The Board readily agreed to take on the additional mission. From then on, planning and building for the loop trail was carried out by FOTP. Since the PPMUP also had a vehicular “loop” around the mountain, Jim began calling the hiking trail the “Ring.” Mary added “the Peak” — a valuable addition that pinned it down to the Pikes Peak area, since this had the potential to become a nationally known trail.
FOTP took up the identifying, begun by the working group, of specific alignments, segment by segment, using existing trails wherever possible, in accordance with the PPMUP. Mary coordinated this effort with the Forest Service and CSU, since all of the early effort was on their lands. She and Jim scouted routes for the three easiest gaps — notably a bypass (Esther/Crystal) around the Pikes Peak Highway maintenance area, between the Mount Esther Trail and Crystal Creek; a connection (Raspberry Mountain) from existing Forest roads southwest of North Catamount Reservoir over to the Crags Road; and a connection (Putney Gulch) from the Crags Road over to Horsethief Park. USFS performed a NEPA and issued a favorable decision memorandum. Frank Landis tweaked and staked the routes, and Mary mobilized FOTP volunteers to do the building – first the Esther/Crystal bypass, then Raspberry Mountain, then Putney Gulch — one segment at a time. Also, it was made known that using CSU and USFS roads as trail route in these areas was to be regarded as an expediency for completing the Ring as soon as possible, and that in later years consideration would be given to building actual trails parallel to these roads.
By 2003 it became time to start signing RTP. Carol Beckman agreed to lead the signing. Jim Strub agreed to arrange for the posts and decals, and to design an acceptable logo. Within hours of the logos coming out of his computer, they had gone viral — stationery, T-shirts, you name it. The signage used two colors: green for counterclockwise and brown for clockwise – both colors approved by the USFS as commensurate with their colored signage system. Generous donations paid for the posts and decals. The logos appear at the top of this document.
Meanwhile Mary and Jim scouted candidate RTP routes from Ruxton Avenue to Cascade, using the Ute Indian Trail as the basis. The Cascade end involved serious private property issues. After a few years CSU and El Paso County Parks began studies and proposals for re-establishing the Ute Pass Regional Trail thru this area. In October 2015 that effort finally came to a conclusion with a decision by the County Commissioners to route the Ute trail along the general route used by the Utes – basically what Mary and Jim had scouted ten years earlier. When complete, the Ute trail will fill one of the gaps in the Ring on the northeast side of the Peak. In 2014 Manitou Springs closed the other gap when they built the Iron Mountain Trail, completing a long-missing section of the Intemann Trail.
Closing these two gaps leaves only the most well-known gap of all — the 8-mile section in the southwest quadrant. In 2003 Mary and Jim began scouting the area and talking with some of the private land owners. They found a route for a sustainable trail from Pancake Rocks down into the Oil Creek drainage and then over a ridge to an existing trail along the West Fork of West Beaver Creek, from where there are several alternatives for reaching Gillette. In August of 2003 they submitted a map and written proposal for this connection to the USFS (see attachment). No USFS action was ever taken on it. The southeast end of it assumed use of an existing road in the Cripple Creek watershed, a use which at the time seemed agreeable to that City and the Timberline Camp. That area has stunning scenery.
In subsequent years many FOTP people have continued to scout various routes through this now well-known 8-mile gap between Pancakes Rocks and the “Watergate” on Forest Road 376. Besides Mary and Jim, scouting parties have included Mary’s husband Jim, Eric Swab, Steve Bremner, Paul Mead, and TOSC’s Bill Koerner. In recent years TOSC has become more involved. They are now using their considerable resources to raise this project to a stronger, more public level. TOSC’s Director, Susan Davies, is firmly behind the project.
Submitted by Jim Strub
November 2015
Ring the Peak, Beginnings
by Mary Burger
Where did the idea for a trail around Pikes Peak come from? It did not simply coalesce out of thin air. There had been a movement of concerned citizens advocating for it for over forty years. There had been many public meeting and agency discussions. But, no plan had been developed. There were several versions ‘on the table’. But, as with many great ideas, without a single advocacy group it stagnated.
During the master planning process the topic of discussion was how to reduce traffic on Barr Trail. Barr Trail was and is over capacity. The proposed solutions included charging for parking, and creating a fee based permit system. Neither proposal was enforceable or palatable to the citizens group during the planning process. So, the circumnavigate Pikes Peak trail and an additional trail to the summit were proposed to divert traffic from the overused Barr Trail, and both solutions made it into the Master Plan.
A citizens group from the master planning process met separately to discuss which of the many proposed routes would receive ‘official’ designation. The concept agreed upon was that the trail should not use Barr Trail. It should connect frequently to urban access, to allow as much opportunity for parking etc., and, as much as possible, use existing non-motorized trails, and only use vehicular roads as a last resort. The group then took a copy of the Pikes Peak Atlas and drew the agreed upon route out. The route included several noticeable ‘holes’ where no trail existed:
- In the middle of the Intemann Trail.
- From the top of the historic Ute Indian trail to Cascade.
- From the utility easement on Mt Esther to the base of Crystal Reservoir.
- From the west end of Limber Pine Trail to the Forest Service road to Crags Campground
- From the end of the Crags Campground road to Putney Gulch
- And, from Pancake Rocks to Bull Park.
There were several places where we had to use vehicular roads to achieve connections. The thought was to complete the rest of the plan, then work on getting around the roads. These connections are:
- To bypass the hole in the middle of Intemann Trail
- Use Highway 24 to go from the top of the Ute trail into Cascade. Use city streets and sidewalks to go from Cascade to the base of Mt Esther trail.
- Use the dirt roads within the North Slope Recreation Area from the base of Crystal Reservoir to Limber Pine Trail.
- Use the Crags road from where we would intersect it near the Mennonite Camp to the end.
- Use High Drive to connect the Palmer Loop with the Bear Creek Trail
- And, use several off highway roads to connect Jones Park to Bull Park.
- And in the meantime connect Bull Park to Pancake Rocks using highways.
The route was submitted, and included in the Master Plan.
- The middle of Intemann has been resolved by the City of Manitou Springs.
- The top of Ute trail is still under consideration. We thought we had a resolution with CSU, but it fell apart.
- The City of Colorado Springs owned the land for the connection from Mt Esther to Crystal Reservoir and immediately gave permission to begin building that section because it would bypass the Pikes Peak Highway maintenance area. It seems there was already a problem with people hiking the utility easement into the maintenance area, and the oversized Tonka Toys were too much fun to ignore.
- The two trails from the North Slope and into Putney gulch took two years to pass NEPA and an additional 5 years to build.
- We have been unable to find any acceptable trail route from Pancake Rocks to Bull Park.
As for the motorized routes, the only one we have been successful in removing from the route has been the city street bypass of the hole in the middle of the Intemann trail. And that was not our success. That was the town of Manitou Springs’ accomplishment.
FOTP: A Group of Friends Working to Make a Difference
by Mary Burger
I want to tell you about Friends of the Peak, (FOTP). While many people are ‘friends’, and each have their own perspective of how and why we came to be, I was there at the beginning. I will give you my version of this history. I cannot give any other. I hope I do not upset anyone if my story does not match their remembrances. Perspective is everything, and this is my perspective. So let’s begin at the beginning:
I am Mary Burger. I moved to the base of Pikes Peak in 1985 because my job brought me here. I was working as a production manager in a local manufacturing plant. During the course of this history, I transitioned to systems engineering and cybernetics analyst, and then retired. My background is in figuring out how to get things done, and how to organize people to do it. I fell in love with Pikes Peak as soon as I saw it, and all the early years of hiking and exploring it just cemented that feeling. Within a couple of years, I stumbled upon a group of people who were planning to build a new trail: The Intemann Trail (ITC). They had contacted another group: Volunteers for Outdoor Colorado, (VOC), and asked for help. I joined both groups and discovered my passion. I love volunteering in the outdoors! I love building trails! I lived for the weekends, and the time I could spend with other like-minded people creating trails, planting vegetation, restoring damaged area, etc. I learned to plan and implement projects from VOC, and to plan and build trails with ITC. Then, in about 1994, I met Gail Snyder. By then the ITC was nearing its completion. There was one section which could not be built due to access issues which would not be resolved for almost a score of years. So, I was a “rebel without a cause”. I wanted to continue volunteering in the outdoors close to home. I wanted to ‘take on Pikes Peak’.
Gail Snyder was an intern working with the geology department of UCCS. She was doing the field work for the “Huber Report”; a report on the damage being done to the ecosystems of Pikes Peak by the Pikes Peak Highway. It was completed, and presented to the City of Colorado Springs, and on the way to being just another report shelved in the archives, when Gail said ‘No way Jose!’ She decided to activate a group of concerned citizens and try to make a difference. She held community meetings, and met with the major agencies who manage land on Pikes Peak. She called on experts in various fields related to the health of the mountain. She contacted me, and asked me to speak for 20 minutes on “How to build a good trail”. I spent a couple hours explaining why I could not do that. But, when she asked for volunteers to form a group which would attempt to affect a positive change on Pikes Peak, I was there!
Gail also recruited Linda Korman. Linda was a local business woman who understood the importance of a firm foundation for business. She worked tirelessly on the mountain of paperwork necessary to make FOTP a legal corporation in Colorado, and to obtain the 501(c)3 designation from the IRS.
Gail recruited many more. Some would become members of the board; others would volunteer their expertise, or their hard work. She recruited academics, artists, athletes, craftsmen, politicians and concerned citizens. Everyone who was concerned about Pikes Peak was encouraged to express their love of the mountain in whatever way they felt driven. She helped us all follow our passion. She got the word got out through media coverage, word of mouth, and awareness raising sessions. Our membership grew.
To understand the situation, we must digress into a little bit of geology. I am not a geologist. We have over the years, had several geology professors on the board and I think I can summarize the situation. Pikes Peak results from an old magma pool which formed under a sea. The magma heated the compressed sand above it and created varying degrees of granite. The closer the sand was to the intruding magma, the more it crystallized, and the harder it became. The further away it was, the less crystallized it became. Eventually, the magma pushed the earth up forming what would become Pikes Peak. It cooled and solidified without ever erupting. There is a lot more to this very interesting subject, but this is a history of FOTP not Pikes Peak.
OK, so here is Pikes Peak in 1995: hard rock in the center, and soft crumbly rock, (devitrified granite or sediment) on the outside. The problem is that when sediment gets wet, it flows. When the sediment flows, it covers the vegetation and stifles life. This problem was exacerbated by the Pikes Peak Highway, which was built on gravel slopes. Whenever the sediment flowed away or eroded, the highway management would haul in more gravel to replace it to keep the highway open. That gravel would then flow away and more would be brought in, in a never ending cycle of gravel flow. The gravel flow below the Pikes Peak Highway had buried the vegetation in some areas up to 30 feet deep over many acres of what had been subalpine forest.
The sediment flows everywhere on Pikes Peak, not just from the highway. It flows anywhere the surface is not stabilized by vegetation. Most of the area on Pikes Peak above 11,000 feet is covered by vegetation called tundra, after similar plants found in the Arctic Circle. These are small plants which grow very slowly in the short season attaining only inches of height after centuries of growth. Sediment flow is a normal process on Pikes Peak. The vegetation will return after the flow stabilizes. But, it will take centuries.
We also have the problem of popularity. Pikes Peak is a national icon. Almost every American knows about it. A vast majority have either made the pilgrimage to see it, or wish they could. Pikes Peak was being loved to death by the trampling of too many feet, which kills off the vegetation and exposes the sediment. The sediment flows.
From the beginning, Friends of the Peak used community discourse to determine what was important. We came up with a core set of values: We wanted to be involved in the discussion of how to best protect the mountain from further damage by human use, and restore the eco-systems which were being damaged. Being humans, we are impatient; we don’t want to wait centuries for a solution. We want the problem fixed in our lifetimes! We were opposed to reducing or limiting human visitation. In fact, we wanted to increase it so that more people would love Pikes Peak as we do. And we wanted to improve the experience of the visitors. Thus, our tag line: We work to preserve, restore, and appreciate Pikes Peak.
Back in the day, 1995, a lot of people were quite upset with the situation on Pikes Peak, particularly the condition of the highway, and the plant life around the highway. Many people were looking for someone to blame. It must be somebody’s fault. There must be an enemy. Once you know the enemy it is fair to scream at them, and hit them with nasty letters to the editor, sue them in court, and beat them up any way you can.
But, who was the enemy? Was it the City of Colorado Springs? Was it the Forest Service; the Pikes Peak Highway Managers; the Race to the Clouds; the Colorado Springs Utilities? All of these organizations, and especially the people who worked within these agencies loved the mountain. FOTP decided to take a different approach. We decided to be friends with all the agencies who were in control of the mountain, and use that friendly influence to improve the situation.
The agencies that control more than 80% of the land mass on the mountain are: The United States Forest Service, (USFS), Colorado Springs Utilities, (CSU), and the managers of the Pikes Peak Highway, (PPH). Members of the board of FOTP met with these agencies and entered into a contract with them in which they agreed, if we would submit a yearly plan for their approval, we could have access to conduct educational trips on their lands. This contract was later modified to include work projects.
That first year, we conducted trips up onto the mountain, and we held seminars in town. The second year, we conducted our first work days. By the third year, we were doing more work days, and fewer educational events. And by the fourth year we were focusing on working to improve the situation, and educating the agencies on what could be done differently to minimize the negative impact on the mountain.
Our early projects were single day efforts with from a dozen to perhaps 50 volunteers at a time. Our initial work was all about containing the sediment flow, and protecting the tundra. The agencies were not convinced that anything could be done. We had some volunteers who were very concerned that the road cut above the highway was continuously shedding chunks of tundra which were swept away by the rains. And we had others who felt the largest problem was that the sediment continued to flow off damaged areas and cover more tundra.
There were two initiatives started: one mobilized to collect the tundra chunks and preserve them in a high altitude basin. Later, once we had stabilized an area, we would plant the reclaimed chunks of vegetation at Devil’s Playground. We also planted seedlings, and cuttings provided by the USFS. The other built sediment traps and barriers to stop or slow down the sediment flow, at a couple locations along the highway and at Devil’s Playground. All of this work was experimental. The USFS had no procedures to tell us how to do this work. So, we kept records, and did statistical analysis and helped the USFS to write reports and establish the methods that are used to stabilize the sediment and restore the tundra on Pikes Peak and other high mountain environments to this day.
After a while, the PPH said they could handle the sediment trapping better mechanically. Now that they understood the concept, they realized the traps needed to be bigger and stronger than anything we could build by hand. But, what they really needed was restoration of the cut slopes, and building some short trails from parking lots to overlooks. So, we restored the cut slopes at mile 4, mile 11, and later at mile 9. And, we built a short interpretive trail from the Crystal Reservoir parking lot, and an overlook trail at the Crowe Gulch parking lot.
After a couple years, Gail Allen joined FOTP. She had been a summer contract worker for USFS doing maintenance on Barr Trail, until Congress stopped the funding. Since then she had voluntarily, and single handedly, been maintaining Barr Trail. She needed help. With our help she founded the Trail Dogs: a group of volunteers who took on the monumental task of assessing the needs of Barr Trail, and making repairs. Her idea was to have one Trail Dog for each mile of trail. She found about a dozen of the 14 needed volunteers. We funded their training from VOC, and began paying for the tools and materials for Barr Trail repair. From then on, we staged a joint project every year with the Trail Dogs, addressing the issues identified by the Trail Dogs.
About this same time, the town of Cascade and the Trails and Open Space Coalition reached an agreement with a land owner to open a new access to the Mt. Esther trail. The old access had been located exactly where the landowner decided to put his house. FOTP was asked to design the trail and lead the work. We opened the new access and then spent several years of single day projects repairing and improving the trail to the top of the ridge, and then to the junction with a utility road, as well as repairing and relocating the connection from Crowe Gulch to the Mt. Esther trail. This work forced us to begin developing our own set of crew leaders, rather than have VOC do the training.
We were beginning to go in a lot of different directions by now. And our discussions with the agencies were asking “How do we know what we should do next?” So, along with our agency partners, with CSU taking the lead and making the largest monetary contribution, the public process for the Pikes Peak Master Plan was launched. This process was much larger than anything FOTP could have managed. But there was at least one, and generally several FOTP board members at every meeting for the Master Plan. Once it was finished, in 1999, we considered that we had our ‘marching orders’.
The Pikes Peak Master Plan called for a citizens group or foundation to head up the creation of a non-motorized trail to circumnavigate Pikes Peak, later called Ring the Peak. It also called for the maintenance of a second trail to the summit of Pikes Peak, now known as the Devil’s Playground Trail. It also called for the various agencies to work together to support the citizen’s group, and to accomplish other restorative work on Pikes Peak. After the plan was complete, FOTP continued to hold meeting with the groups who were represented during the open meetings, to define the location of the Ring and to invite them to join us in accomplishing the work. Some of the members joined FOTP.
I think the next year, the USFS and PPH settled a lawsuit with the Sierra Club which required PPH to re-engineer the highway, and harden surface it to prevent further sediment flow from the highway. The Sierra Club settlement also called for restoration of the damaged areas surrounding the highway. The job was seen, by the board, as too large for the all-volunteer FOTP, and another group, RMFI, accepted the contract. They have a paid staff.
FOTP formed a group of interested friends to locate and sign the Ring the Peak Trail. A sponsor was found to pay for the materials. The group was led by Carol Beckman and worked to find an acceptable sign, design a simple yet distinguishing logo, and then install the signs. And, then re-install the signs, as the first ones were vandalized. And, then re-install them some more. Each year there are fewer signs destroyed.
Meanwhile, we received immediate approval to build a portion of the Ring the Peak, (RTP), from the top of the Mt. Esther trail to the base of Crystal dam, and to begin the repair of the Devil’s Playground Trail. The first portion of the RTP is actually on City-owned property, the other two new trails are on forest property. They would need a NEPA, (National Environmental Protection Agency) study before the USFS could allow them to be built. So, in that year we not only held a couple projects building the Ring the Peak Trail, we began the work repairing the lower portion of Devil’s Playground trail. We also planned a combined project for the summit of Devil’s Playground Trail to happen the next year with VOC, and designed the two remaining new trails for Ring the Peak, so that the USFS could study the proposed alignment to ensure it complied with NEPA requirements. That is a lot of work. But, when you get a group of people together, all committed to the same plan, and everyone working on the things they are most passionate about, a lot can happen.
We continued to grow organically into whatever was needed.
During the work on the new RTP, some of the volunteers were discussing that they would like to continue the work on a weekday rather than being limited to weekends. These volunteers were either retired, or underemployed, or worked weekends, and wanted something fun to do, that was low cost, and would allow them to make a contribution. Voila! The Thursday work day was invented.
In planning the Devil’s Playground project we realized we could not be effective if we asked people to drive all the way around to the western slope of Pikes Peak and hike to the project site, and then return home at the end of the day. We simply would not have any time to work on the project. So we borrowed a concept from VOC: The weekend project. We arranged for camping and hosted a dinner at the end of the Saturday for everyone who would be staying the next day. We would use the weekend project format for at least 7 more years while working on projects on the western side of Pikes Peak.
The rest, as they say, is history. Once the RTP connection was complete, the every other Thursday group would go on to maintain basically every access from the front range into the Pikes Peak Forest: the Bear Creek Trail, The North Cheyenne Canyon Trail, The Saint Mary’s Falls Trail, and the former Section 16 (now Palmer Red Rock Loop) trail. And we continue to select trails for repair and schedule Thursday work days to this day.
The weekend format was used to repair the Devil’s Playground trail, and build the two new trails for RTP: the Raspberry Mountain Trail and the Putney Gulch Trail.
We continue to use the single day format for repair of the Horse Thief Falls Trail, and at various locations closer to urban access.
Our crew leader training course grew over the years so that eventually we were training many of the City Parks maintenance people, and leading the coalition training for most of the ‘Friends’ groups in the city today.
Let’s not forget Barr trail: The Ultimate Pikes Peak Experience; the most heavily used trail on the mountain, perhaps on any mountain in the USA. We have held at least one work day every year on Barr trail. We made many efforts over the years to address some of the most difficult sections, including but not limited to: rebuilding the 16 golden stars, hiring contractors to repair the area above the A frame, staging projects out of Barr Camp, or from the top of Long Ranch Road to install drainage devices, and repair the center section of the trail, and replacing the rails on the lower switchbacks. The problems with the trail continue and worsen with the increased pressure on the lower section due to increased use of the Incline. In 2012 we began seriously focusing on Barr Trail. With the help of the Incline coalition, the town of Manitou Springs, and other partners, a study was completed to determine how to correctly address the many varied problems with this poorly designed trail. Much of this work is being contracted out. But, much of it will be completed by volunteers and FOTP.
And let us never forget the ongoing work for the RTP. The existing trail network only circumnavigates about 80% of Pikes Peak. We have been working with USFS, local landowners, and municipalities to obtain permission to complete the trail around the southwest corner of the mountain. Several alignments have been scouted and proposed. The work is ongoing. Many people have completed the hike or bike ride around the peak through the backcountry where there is not trail. It is not illegal. At this time, due to the sensitive nature of the environment, and the need to protect the habitat of the bighorn sheep, we are still looking for an acceptable alignment for the trail.
In summary, with the help of thousands of volunteers we have successfully demonstrated that sediment flow can be stopped. Tundra can be restored. And we have built about 7 miles of new trail and repaired over 20 miles of exiting trail, established the Ring the Peak Trail, and much more. We have made a difference in the environment of Pikes Peak, and the quality of experience of perhaps a million people. This is what a group of friends can accomplish in 20 years. I am proud to have been a part of this endeavor, and I hope it continues for the next 20 years, and four score beyond that.